Parisian KISS; Psyop for the Stupid.

Posted in Agenda 21, BBC, Israhell, Jews & syanim, Mind Wars and Psyops | Tagged , , , , , , ,

Ursula Haverbeck: 87 Year Old Grandmother Jailed for Denying Holocaust.

German 87-year-old “Nazi grandma” jailed for denying the Holocaust
2015-11-14 6:55


Editor’s Comment: Is she right to question the unquestionable? Decide for yourself, look at the videos linked up below this article.

A well-known 87-year-old German “Neo-Nazi grandmother” has been sentenced to 10 months in prison after being found guilty of denying the Holocaust.

Bild newspaper reported Friday that Ursula Haverbeck, dubbed the “Nazi grandma” in the German media, said she will appeal Thursday’s Hamburg state court verdict.

Haverbeck was charged earlier this year after giving an interview outside the trial of former SS Sgt. Oskar Groening claiming Auschwitz wasn’t a death camp.

When she challenged the presiding judge in Hamburg to prove it was, Bild reports that he said he wouldn’t debate someone who “can’t accept any facts.”

“Neither do I have to prove to you the world is round,” Magistrate Bjoern Joensson said.

In his ruling, Joensson said, according to Agence France-Presse, “It is deplorable that his woman, who is still so active given her age, uses her energy to spread such hair-raising nonsense.”

“She is a lost cause,” he added, AFP reported.

Haverbeck is a notorious extremist who was once chaired a far-right trainng center shut down in 2008 for spreading Nazi propaganda, according to AFP. She has a rap sheet and a suspended sentence for sedition.

Haverbeck was arrested on hate speech charges in June, according to reports.

Groening, who gave lengthy testimony on how the death camp functioned, was convicted of 300,000 counts of accessory to murder for the Jews killed while he was there.

The charges against Groening related to a period between May and July 1944 when hundreds of thousands of Jews from Hungary were brought to the Auschwitz-Birkenau complex in Nazi-occupied Poland. Most were immediately gassed to death.

The 94-year-old man was sentenced to four years in prison in July.


Is she right to question this unquestionable event? Decide for yourself, look at these arguments:

Spielberg’s Hoax – The Last Days of The Big Lie

Auschwitz: Surprising Hidden Truth

David Cole in Auschwitz

Judea Declares War on Germany

The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth

The Jewish Gas Chamber Hoax

The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax

One Third of the Holocaust

The Great Holocaust Trial (1985)

David Irving – The Biggest Lie

David Irving – The Faking of Adolf Hitler for History

David Irving – Churchill’s War

David Irving – Smear Campaigns to Stifle Truth in History

Fred A. Leuchter Gas Chamber Expert

Doug Christie (The Lawyer Who Defended Ernst Zundel) on “Crossfire” 1985

Sylvia Stolz – Lawyer Who Was Jailed for Presenting Evidence in the Zundel Trial

Eisenhower’s Rhine-Meadows Death Camps

Ernst Zundel in Conversation w/ Dr. Fredrick Toben

Ernst Zundel – Interviewed by an Israeli journalist (1996)

Holocaust, Hate Speech and Were the Germans so Stupid?


Posted in holohoax, Jews & syanim, Mind Wars and Psyops | Tagged , , , ,

Jews at “Forefront of Welcoming” Invasion

Jews at “Forefront of Welcoming” Invasion

European Jews are “on the forefront of welcoming the influx of largely Muslim migrants and refugees,” one of Europe’s leading Jewish historians, Dr. Diana Pinto has claimed.


Speaking at a Jewish Community Center’s world conference in Jerusalem last week, Pinto, a Senior Fellow and a board member of the London-based Institute for Jewish Policy Research, described how “European Jewry, remembering its own postwar refugee status, is on the forefront of welcoming the influx of largely Muslim migrants and refugees—one of the greatest wagers of the coming decade.”

According to coverage of her speech printed in the Jerusalem-based Times of Israel, Pinto, who is also a founding member of the European Council on Foreign Relations, said that “in this interface with peoples holding historically laden identities, European Jewry is saying, ‘It doesn’t matter where you come from, what matters is where you’re going.’”

Pinto’s comments were confirmed by an article in the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of September 8, 2015 (“European Jews, mindful of risks, urge aid to refugees”), which told of several instances of Jews pushing for aid for the invading nonwhite hordes even though they were well aware that many of the incoming Arabs were “anti-Semitic.”


The JTA quoted Ron van der Wieken, chairman of the Central Jewish Organization of the Netherlands, as saying that while he was “aware that some Middle Eastern refugees harbor very negative feelings toward Jews … Jews cannot withdraw support from those in need and fleeing serious violence,” and urged Holland to devise a “charitable” refugee policy.

Zoltan Radnoti, the newly elected chairman of the rabbinical board of the Mazsihisz umbrella group of Hungarian Jewish communities, was then quoted as saying, “I help the refugees with fear that I am helping send danger to other Jews in Europe. I know some of the refugees may have fired on our [Israeli] soldiers. Others would have done so in a heartbeat. I know. But I am duty bound to help.”

Mazsihisz has set up collection depots in Budapest Jewish institutions from which it delivers food, clothes, diapers, medicine, water, and other necessities to the invaders.

In Italy, the JTA reported, the Jewish community of Milan threw open the doors of its Holocaust museum to accommodate homeless invaders from the Middle East and Africa.

In Brussels, the JTA continued, one Menachen Margolin, a Chabad rabbi and director of the European Jewish Association lobby, led a delegation of rabbis to deliver food and nonperishables to the invaders.


The Times of Israel reported earlier (“5 things you can do to help the refugee crisis,” September 17, 2015), that an emergency meeting of the Board of Deputies of British Jews was held in September to “coordinate over 20 UK Jewish organizations’ responses to the refugee and migrant crisis.”

The Board of Deputies of British Jews has even set up a special website called “Support Refugees,” supported by all major Jewish synagogues and organizations in the UK, to “be a one-stop shop for those who want to get involved in supporting refugees and asylum seekers both in the UK and abroad.”


Jews in Britain demand more nonwhite invaders be allowed into the UK–but not into Israel….

The Times of Israel went on to detail different ways its readers could help the invaders in Europe. Firstly, the article told its readers not to send food or clothing, but only money—because, as Shachar Zahavi, from the Israeli NGO IsraAid, was quoted as saying, “We prefer to purchase relief items on the ground [in Greece].”

What was really needed, Zahavi said, was “baby carriers to be distributed in Greece to those families that are still on the move and crossing borders.” In addition, IsraAid was organizing Jewish doctors to set up clinics in Greece and Serbia.

The Times of Israel also reported that the US-based Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS) had announced that it has hundreds of staff on the ground in twelve countries where it provides refugees with legal assistance, trauma counseling, and training in sustainable livelihoods.

Of course, in typical Jewish Supremacist hypocritical fashion, these Jews and their organizations are all in favor of the nonwhite invaders pouring into Europe—but at the same time, all support Israel, which has flatly refused to accept one “refugee” from anywhere, never mind Syria.

As detailed in the LA Times of September 6, 2015 (“One country that won’t be taking Syrian refugees: Israel”), Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israel’s “lack of demographic and geographic depth” required controlling its borders against both “illegal migrants and terrorism.”


This “lack of demographic depth” to which he referred is of course the fact that immigration into Israel is strictly controlled and is racially-based: no one who is not Jewish can immigrate to that state.

This racial exclusivity is what is meant by the oft-heard calls for the maintenance of Israel as “a Jewish and democratic state”—the Jewish propagandists always throw in the “democratic” part of that cry in order to divert attention away from the fact that what they really want is a racial Jewish state, for Jews only.

While it is of course the right of every race and people to have their own state, it seems that the international Jewish lobby only wants to reserve this right for themselves, and deny it to everyone else.

Hence the international Jewish lobby, through direct political action and their controlled mass media outlets, is always “at the forefront” of promoting the nonwhite invasion of European nations—but at the same time fanatically supports Israel’s closed border policy and that state’s racially based immigration policies.


Posted in Agenda 21, EU, Israhell, Jews & syanim, lawful rebellion, Mind Wars and Psyops, white genocide | Tagged , , , ,

Justice and Jewish Personality Politics

Justice and Jewish Personality Politics

The following is  the index  I submitted to the British Columbia Supreme Court in relation to Arthur Topham’s trial. This text may help activists and anti imperialist commentators in their future  battles with Israel’s supporters,  Hasbara merchants and  Sayanim in general.

Jewish Symbols
The Holocaust
Germany Must Perish/Israel Must Perish
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed

Jewish Symbols

Once we realise the crucial distinctions among Jews (the people), Judaism (the religion) and Jewishness (ideology and politics), we are ready to accept that Jewish symbols that appear within different Jewish political contexts that are not religious often present ethical problems.  For instance, Israel decorates its airplanes and tanks with the Star of David. Similarly, the Menorah is borrowed as a symbol by the controversial Israeli Intelligence Service (The Mossad). The traditional Jewish knotted skullcap and the Tztitis1  have become the symbol of the West Bank extremists.

It is reasonable to assume that when such symbols are used as political identifiers they can and should be critiqued and analyzed within the context of their political meanings.


zionismZionism is often defined as the promise to bring the Jews back to their ‘promised land’ and to form a Jewish National Homeland, i.e., the State of Israel. Yet that definition suggests that, at least from an Israeli perspective, Zionism finished its role in 1948 with the foundation of the Jewish State.  However, early Zionist writings suggest that Zionism had a far wider, deeper and even radical purpose than merely forming a Jewish State. Early Zionists such as Herzl, Nordaw, Borochov, A.D. Gordon and Kazanelson looked at the Diaspora Jew with contempt. Zionism was, for them, the promise to civilize Diaspora Jews by means of ‘homecoming’ and productivity (as opposed to speculatory capitalism).

This point is crucial for the court because it confirms that early Zionists were driven by deep hatred of the Jew and their language was often virulently anti Semitic. Here are just a few of many examples:

The wealthy Jews control the world, in their hands lies the fate of governments and nations. They set governments one against the other. When the wealthy Jews play, the nations and the rulers dance. One way or the other, they get rich.
— Theodor Herzl, Deutsche Zeitung

The above Herzl’s problematic quote appears  around 4 min’ 47 sec’ in…

The Jew is a caricature of a normal, natural human being, both physically and spiritually. As an individual in society he revolts and throws off the harness of social obligations, knows no order nor discipline.
— Our Shomer2

The fact is undeniable that the Jews collectively are unhealthy and neurotic. Those professional Jews who, wounded to the quick, indignantly deny this truth are the greatest enemies of their race, for they thereby lead them to search for false solutions, or at most palliatives.
— Ben Frommer3

The enterprising spirit of the Jew is irrepressible. He refuses to remain a proletarian. He will grab at the first opportunity to advance to a higher rung in the social ladder.
— Ber Borochov4


Scholars are divided on the question of whether Jews have their origin in the Near East. However, It may be noted that Semitism is not a racial category or reference but it is rather a name for a family of Middle Eastern languages.

Anti Semitism is commonly used as a general term for hatred of Jews. However, if Jews have little to do with the Near East, then the label ‘anti Semitism’ also serves to associate the Jews and their origin with a place they have nothing or very little to do with.

Holocaust (vs. religion)

The term ‘Holocaust’ is commonly used to refer to the Jewish catastrophe that took place in Germany and occupied Europe between 1933 and 1945. Since 1945 Jewish institutions have worked relentlessly to restrict research of the Holocaust and its historicity. In the 1970’s the great Orthodox Jewish philosopher, Professor Yeshayahu Leibowitz, came to the conclusion that the Holocaust or Shoah had become the most popular Jewish religion. Since then, many more scholars have joined Leibowitz’s view; amongst them are the philosopher Adi Offir and the Jewish theologian Marc Ellis. In the 1990’s American historian Norman Finkelstein’s The Holocaust Industry was published, a scholarly academic work that confirmed legendary Israeli diplomat, ambassador, and Knesset member Abba Eban’s 1950’s adage: ‘There’s no business like the Shoah Business.’

Unlike many Jewish politicians and scholars, in my book, The Wandering Who, I insist that for history to be a meaningful, it must be realised as an attempt to revise the past as we move along. As such, history is, by definition, a revisionist project. I argue that for the Holocaust to sustain its ethical meaning it must be reinstated as a chapter in history rather than a stagnated religion.

Germany Must Perish/Israel Must Perish

germanyNeither I, nor any contemporary scholar I know of, have written about Theodore N. Kaufman’s  Germany Must Perish before Mr. Topham made it into a satire (Israel Must Perish). I learned that even the Crown’s Expert, Mr. Rudner, admitted that he wasn’t aware of Kaufman’s text. The necessary conclusion is that it is actually Mr. Topham’s satire that brought this horrid text to our attention.

This is exactly what satire is all about:

“A genre of literature in which vices, follies, abuses, and shortcomings are held up to ridicule, ideally with the intent of shaming individuals, corporations, government or society itself, into improvement.”5

A satire is a way of using humour to show that someone or something is foolish, weak, bad, etc. I cannot imagine life without satire, but I guess that perhaps some people in Canada are determined to abolish this genre.

In his documentation to the court Mr. Rudner stated that ‘Germany Must Perish’ is a hateful text. Did it really take a Jewish official more than seven decades to admit that the call to eradicate the German people is unacceptable? Is not Mr. Rudner’s long delayed denunciation the direct outcome of Mr. Topham’s satire? I believe that Mr. Rudner’s well-deserved denunciation proves the necessity of satire and Arthur Topham’s contribution to the genre.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion

For over a century, Jewish organisations all around the world have expended great effort to prove that the protocols are a forgery as well as fictional. This is slightly puzzling considering the fact that there are no reasonable opponents arguing that the Protocols are an authentic document. However, critical study of Israeli and Jewish identity politics reveals that Israel and Jews are widely over represented in Western politics, culture, finance, media and so on.

In 2006 the prestigious and superlative American academics, Mearsheimer and Walt had published The Israeli Lobby and US Foreign Policy, a study that argued that Israel dominated American foreign policy.

In 2008 the Jewish journalist Joel Stein, wrote a large article published in the LA Times,  “Is Hollywood Run by Jews? You Bet.” In the article Stein boasted of Jewish domination in Hollywood.

A few months ago, the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz ran a headline that read:  “Netanyahu’s Address to Congress Is Not a Speech. It’s a Coup.”

But most interesting in this regard is Theodore Herzl, the founding father of political Zionism, whose view of Jews were identical to the anti Jewish views expressed in the Protocols:

“The wealthy Jews control the world, in their hands lies the fate of governments and nations. They set governments one against the other. When the wealthy Jews play, the nations and the rulers dance. One way or the other, they get rich.” (Theodor Herzl, Deutsche Zeitung)

Herzl, Haaretz, Joel Stein and Mearsheimer and Walt, were not referring to a fictional lobby or a forged narrative. They were actually discussing authentic people and politics that are dominating political discourse and even, at times, endangering world peace.

I tend to believe that the endless Jewish and Zionist attempts to refer to the Protocols as an anti Semitic forgery is a tactical move that is intended to divert attention from the reality of forceful Jewish lobby groups such as AIPAC, CFIJA, CFI, LFI, CRIF etc’.

The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today

Elizabeth Dilling expresses some controversial views; she believes, for instance, that the “purpose of Judaism is to exterminate or enslave Christians and that the Jews studied the Talmud to learn how to undermine Christianity.”

This is a devastating statement, however, reading the words of chief Israeli Sephardic Rabbi and Talmud sage Rabbi Ovadia Youssef, confirms that at least some top Jewish Rabbis totally agree with Dilling.

“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel,”  he said at a weekly Saturday night sermon in October 2010.

If the court is interested in Jewish genocidal texts, Torat Ha’Melech (King’s Torah), a new book by  Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira is the place to go.

The book includes 230 pages on the laws concerning the killing of non-Jews. According to Shapira, “Non-Jews are ‘uncompassionate by nature’ and should be killed in order to ‘curb their evil inclinations.’ If we kill a gentile who has violated one of the seven commandments… there is nothing wrong with the murder.” Shapira also believes that “there is justification for killing babies if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us, and in such a situation they may be harmed deliberately, and not only during combat with adults.”

Rather than killing the messenger, in this case Mr. Arthur Topham, we might be better advised to deal with the problem he has brought to our attention.

The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed

According to Reed, “Judaism is responsible for the creation of the theory of the master race and that the implication of this belief is that the master race becomes God itself.”

Not only is Reed’s paradigm valid, at least from a theoretical perspective, his views are almost identical to Ze’ev Jabotinsky’s, the founding father of right wing Zionism and the arch mentor of Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party.

In 1914 Jabotinsky wrote:  “the source of national feeling … lies in a man’s blood … in his racio-physical type, and in that alone … a man’s spiritual outlooks are primarily determined by his physical structure … For that reason we do not believe in spiritual assimilation. It is inconceivable, from the physical point of view, that a Jew born to a family of pure Jewish blood … can become adapted to the spiritual outlooks of a German or a Frenchman … He maybe wholly imbued with that German fluid but the nucleus of his spiritual structure will always remain Jewish” …

“There can be no assimilation as long as there is no mixed marriage.”

Reed’s opinions mirror those of some Jewish agitators of his era. The duty of the intellectual is to find such critical links within our cultural heritage. Is not this exactly what Radical Press and Mr. Topham have been doing for the last three decades?

Conclusion (removed by the court)

I may not agree with every statement made by Mr. Topham. But it is clear to me that Mr. Topham is a thinking honest person as well as a humanist. I cannot find a single statement he made that expresses hatred of any kind. I found no instance in which Mr. Topham made a call for any action that might lead to any form of violence or incite hatred.

Mr. Topham’s activity is part of the vital effort to maintain a humanist approach to politics and to continue evolving ethical thinking. The views that I express above, are not only concerned with the public interest, more than anything else, they are in the direct interests of the Jewish people though I accept that many Jews may fail to see it.

  1. Tztitis — the name for specially knotted ritual fringes, or tassels, worn in antiquity by observant Jews. [↩]
  2. Weltanschauung, Hashomer Hatzair December 1936, p.26. [↩]
  3. The Significance of a Jewish State, Jewish Call, Shanghai, May 1935, p. 10. [↩]
  4. The Economic Development of the Jewish People,  1916. [↩]
  5. Wikipedia. [↩]

Gilad Atzmon, now living in London, was born in Israel and served in the Israeli military. He is the author of The Wandering Who and one of the most accomplished jazz saxophonists in Europe. He can be reached at: Read other articles by Gilad, or visit Gilad’s website.

Posted in Jews & syanim | Tagged , ,

Blow Up Parliament.

Blow up Parliament: Stop paying Tax.

Posted in Agenda 21, EU, lawful rebellion | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Albert Burgess’ Missing Kings: The Laymans Guide.


Just quickly: When others say; ” we shouldn’t attack others” or ” that’s just infighting” or “we’re in this together”…When this country, indeed most if not all of the west has the enemy inside the gates, Are we supposed to let sayanim, knowing or otherwise, away with their antics?

I didn’t believe Albert Burgess was intentionally misleading the truth movement in this country as are I believe, that little clique. In researching recently for a book I started 3 or 4 years ago that’s just sat in a draw since, I discovered that in Burgess’ book: The Laymans Guide To The English Constitution, Albert misses out  English kings and events very much relevant to any ‘Laymans guide’.

From my book…one day….

Albert Burgess in his book: Laymans Guide To The English Constitution, mentions the ealdorman as an eldery man who, “could not or would not learn, would be replaced by a younger man”, Burgess, again oddly to me at least, also jumps from Henry III to Edward II, why miss out the King who formed the first modern parliament, who brought the knights, clergy, nobility, as well as the lords and commons together for the first time, he defeated the Welsh and was known as the ‘Hammer of the Scots’, he was a statesman, a lawyer and a soldier? Now I’m not bigging him up, this is longshanks of Braveheart infamy (Hollywood I know, we’ll get to that) but yes, the English did some terrible stuff to the other peoples of these isles, no nation in history has been saintly, but when you intend to lead the charge against the traitors in Britain today, Burgess ought to be a bit more precise and objective; missing out Ed I was a mistake? I think not.

Staying with said book, it also manages to jump from Henry I ( 1100- 1135) to John (1213) missing out Stephen (1135-1154) and again coincidentally misses out Henry II (1135-1189), nearly 80 years of monarchs and related history bypassed, so ‘Laymans’ guide seems almost a euphamism.

During those missing years the ‘Layman’ may not know under the reign of Stephen: regarded by historians as a weak king, there was civil war throughout his reign, during this hegelian conundrum , jews; who Stephen had a fondness for, flourished; communities grew in Norwich, Cambridge and Oxford. Again under Henry II, Albert Burgess’ other missing monarch; jewish communities were found at Lincoln, Northampton, Thetford and Bungay, in Gloucestershire, Hampshire and Wiltshire, London, Norwich, Cambridge and Oxford, (See From Domesday Book to Magna Carta,)

By the time of Henry III, jews and their hatred of Christians,usury, coin clipping and lest we forget; child sacrifice, had spread to include: Bristol, Canterbury, Colchester, Exeter, Hereford, Stamford, Winchester and York, (This is proved by Transactions, xi 99-111, Jewish Hist. Soc., which were lists of taxation of Jews.) and (Geoffrey H Smith and Arnold S Leese)

Perhaps Albert decided the layman didn’t need to know those facts, or that Edward I, just a minor point; expelled the jews from Britain with the Edict of Expulsion of 1290?: Update for the Layman; The edict still stands!

William the Conqueror, aka: William the Bastard, with this battle of Britain by defeating Harold at Hastings in 1066, was an invasion of jews from Normandy. In todays cultural marxist politically correct world, to say such is ‘anti-semitic’ or ‘racist’, convenient don’t you think!

Never the less true: There is little evidence to suggest that Jews settled in England in any large numbers until after the Norman Conquest. It was in Normandy, at Rouen, that a large Jewish community had existed since the Gallo-Roman era (see Gesta Regum Anglorum ii, 371n). William of Malmesbury stated that the Conqueror brought the Jews of London from Rouen. Thus it was armed might, not democracy, which led to England being occupied by Jews.(Geoffrey H Smith and Arnold S Leese)

Burgess’ William the Conqueror is a different beast: “ William chose to maintain the Laws of Edward the Confessor (which were Alfred’s Laws), rather than introduce laws from his native Country of Normandy” (page 4)

Other sources would beg to differ from Burgess’ convenient perceptions including myself, and though I hate to admit it; Wikipedia: The first Jewish communities of significant size came to England with William the Conqueror in 1066.[1] On the conquest of England, William instituted a feudal system in the country, whereby all estates formally belonged to the Crown; the king then appointed lords over these vast estates, but they were subject to duties and obligations (financial and military) to the king. Under the lords were further subjects such as serfs, who were bound and obliged to their lords, and their lords’ obligations. Merchants had a special status in the system as did Jews. Jews were declared to be direct subjects of the King,[2] unlike the rest of the population. This was an ambivalent legal position for the Jewish population, in that they were not tied to any particular lord, but were subject to the whims of the king. This could at times prove advantageous and at other times disadvantageous. Every successive King formally reviewed a royal charter granting Jews the right to remain in England. Jews did not enjoy any of the guarantees of Magna Carta[3] of 1215.

Coincidentally of course; Albert also forgets to mention one English Civil war and one Oliver Cromwell, who also happened to let the chosen ones back into England.

Funny that, dontcha think?

Posted in Jews & syanim, Treason, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , ,

New World Order; Communism By the Back Door.

Update: 17/11/15

Part 12:

Posted in holohoax, Israhell, Jews & syanim, Mind Wars and Psyops | Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Dunblane Lies, Brits Want Their Handguns Back!


“These [common law] rights consist, primarily, in the free enjoyment of personal security, of personal liberty and of private property…to vindicate these rights when actually violated or attacked, the subjects of England are entitled, in the first place, to the regular administration and free course of justice in the courts of law; next to the right of petitioning the king and parliament for redress of grievances and lastly, to the right of having and using arms for self preservation and defence.”

“Commentaries on the Laws of England”
Lord Justice William Blackstone

The publication in 1972 of Firearms Control, by Chief Inspector (later Superintendent) Colin Greenwood, of the West Yorkshire Constabulary, was a landmark in the study of the law relating to firearms and its effects in England and Wales. Based on his research at Cambridge University, Superintendent Greenwood, who is now editor of Guns Review, demonstrated for the first time how the right of the individual to own firearms was firmly embedded in British law, and that the level of armed crime was far lower before the restrictions imposed by the Firearms Act 1920 and subsequent legislation than it was afterwards.


Every place that has been banned guns has seen murder rates go up. You cannot point to one place where murder rates have fallen, whether it’s Chicago or D.C. or even island nations such as England, Jamaica, or Ireland.

For an example of homicide rates before and after a ban, take the case of the handgun ban in England and Wales in January 1997 (source here see Table 1.01 and the column marked “Offences currently recorded as homicide per million population”).  After the ban, clearly homicide rates bounce around over time, but there is only one year (2010) where the homicide rate is lower than it was in 1996.  The immediate effect was about a 50 percent increase in homicide rates.   The homicide rate only began falling when there was a large increase in the number of police officers during 2003 and 2004.   Despite the huge increase in the number of police, the murder rate still remained slightly higher than the immediate pre-ban rate.


Released Cabinet papers, and the diaries of the then Cabinet secretary, reveal that although the government of the day claimed to be introducing the Firearms Act 1920 as a measure to control armed crime, the Cabinet’s real purpose was to prevent the workers from obtaining firearms in what it believed was an imminent Bolshevik uprising. Before 1920, the right of the individual to own firearms was firmly established in law, reaffirmed in such documents as the Bill of Rights of 1689 and Sir William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765), and successfully defended by members of Parliament throughout the 19th century. During the “Tottenham outrage” of 1909, for instance, two Russian socialist-anarchists carried out a wages robbery, shot dead a policeman and a 10-year-old boy, and were pursued by armed citizens and the police, who borrowed at least four pistols from passers-by. (One robber shot himself, the other hid in a cottage where he either shot himself or was killed by the police.) Even under the 1920 Act, and in the 1937 Home Office Memorandum of Guidance on the Implementation of the Firearms Act, personal protection was recognised as a “good reason” for the issuance of a firearms certificate. Although in 1946 the Home Secretary, James Chuter Ede, stated that self-defence was no longer an acceptable reason, as recently as 1979, Clement Freud, Liberal MP, told the Commons that

It is important on the grounds of security to bear in mind that the more people can learn about the use of firearms, the safer, and not the less safe, this country will be….The more people can be encouraged legally to use firearms, the safer and not the less safe will this country be. (quoted on page 314)

pillarsThe Dunblane massacre was an example of the category of homicide known as “spree killing” or “amok killing”, which no gun control law can prevent. In the words of John Douglas, recently retired chief of criminal profiling for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, “You could deprive Hamilton of his guns. But someone like him is mission-oriented and where there is a will, there is a way, even with strict gun laws” (page 284).Mr Stevenson suggests that it is to the problem of development of mass murderers to which our attention should be directed, and not to the further restriction of lawfully-owned firearms.


Dunblane Primary School. ’16 children from this class were shot dead.’The official story is that, on 13 March (7)1996 (7), a mad loner called Thomas Hamilton shot dead 16(7) children at a primary school in Dunblane in Scotland.


Listen to Mick North: 743 rounds and 700 children, did we see our first modern crisis actors at Dunblane?

Don’t Blair and his ilk just love the 7’s: London 7/7/2005…777

All coincidence of course.


He just won Wimbledon 77 years after the last Brit ish male, on the anniversary on the 7/7 bombings by MI5/6 and Mossad, he broke Djokovic’s serve on the seventh game of each set…777

Quote | Posted on by | Tagged , , , , , , ,

The Land of Nod.


I was at a party recently for a good friend’s 50th, most if not all my old mates are 50 now or just over, me being the pup at a young  and spritely 48, it was great seeing everyone together after so long,  it reminds me how quickly time goes, and how much people change…or don’t, living in the land of Nod.

Amongst my buddies was a chap who I’ve known of, and he’s known of me for over 30 years, we’ve always Nodded, said ‘hi, how’s it goin’, the obligatory yet sincere greetings to people we kind of Know, know of. We’ve never had a beer together, any real conversations but I had some respect for him, I knew as a younger man he was respected, a bit of a handful if pushed, now.. a heart attack on hold.

Chatting after a few beers I was saying how I’m going for a career change, his response was: ” you’ve never stuck at anything in your life”…It didn’t sink in what he’d just said, I reminded him I’ve been a brickie since 1992…”But you’ve never worked on site”…I did think that a bit odd, where does he get his perceptions from? I told him I’d lost count of the sites I’d worked on…It was left at that from what I can remember and I went to the bar, slowly it started to niggle me but I left it alone, it was a mate’s party.

If he had any acumen at all, as he knows me so well, he would be taking into consideration the doctors at both the NHS and BUPA  said my days in the trade were over, I’d be on epidurals and pain relief for years to come if not for ever;  to throw out the tablets and stop spinal injections, to get back to fitness, to go self employed and get back on the trowel, bricklaying and plastering, is, I feel, classed as ‘sticking to something‘, maybe he was accounting for the last time I was homeless for almost 18 months, after losing a house thanks to a poison dwarf of en ex wife, and won my battles to get housed after all and sundry said I couldn’t get a flat; also I class as ‘sticking to something’

This chap doesn’t Know me, he thinks he does, as with all our lives there are those who know us and know what’s best for us; they gossip and criticise, pass judgement on our lives, all meant for the best of course, and always in our absence. I should be more like them; work all the hours I’m told to, weekends included, and allow myself a couple of weeks per year to ‘Holiday’, I know of one such ‘builder’ who takes a couple of days PER YEAR off as a holiday with his children ….he’ll swear money and ego are not his gods, while driving around in a two seat sports car with a private plate, wearing a peak cap and a duffle coat…. Mushroom’s: kept in the dark and fed faeces.


They live in the Land of Nod, they have NO D, No Sun;  when we Nod our head, when we Nod off, we lose sight of the sun…  D is the diameter and the radius, the sun on the Horizon, the Egyptian ‘T’, a DeNTaL,

These people don’t shine, they bring darkness.


When we Nod, do we not Bow? does one Bow to the crown?  As a Bow is used in Archery, is not the Royal Arch degree the knowledge of the great year, the procession of the equinoxes; the Zodiac?… a simple Nod, with so much encoded, right in front of those who live in the land of Nod…mushrooms.


I No longer enjoy the building game and have thought it over the last 2 or 3 years, considering injuries carried and the general wear and tear, combined with my loss of interest that a change is afoot. I have had so many laughs and learnt so much in the trade, I’ve done bypasses and bridges, sewage works to sea defences, harbour repairs to deep excavations, I can build a house or a warehouse from footings to chimney pot so I have no regrets…on the contrary.

The whole point of being self employed, apart from recovering from a back injury and 5 years off work, was to keep off the sites; hard, heavy work, long hours and travelling daily, the hypocrisy and beaurocracy, the chase chase chase of the money, man I want this and that, I want, I want… you will need a Mort gage, and a nice shiny car, burn’t into the brain of the mushroom,  the whole thing was not for me anymore, and taxed? A serf in Britain who works 12 months is taxed beyond most peoples comprehension; from January to July/August, every penny goes to the tax man, Every Penny; the serf is permitted the remaining months to live the dream they are indeed in.


So tell a man at a party, or any location of your choice, that tax is by consent and he’s being robbed, or, his big powerful shiny car isn’t his, Of course it is he’ll say….don’t tax it then and see how long it stays yours!….hit them with the Mort gage frauds and fiat currency; silence with a red face , first they laugh, then, if you persist and  they don’t shut down, they get angry…. indeed his taxes are contributing, not just to the most heinous of war crimes seen on this planet, or any other planet I’m aware of, they are not only voting for it, they are paying for it with their hard earned fiat…sorry…cash… to de story our very own existence!


If they respond, as I’ve heard first hand in my local pub; “they can bomb who they like as long as it isn’t here” or when I asked a female, for she is neither a lady or a woman, if she was bothered with the half a million dead Iraqi children?  she shook her head. Reminding them that the jew K pays the EU £33 million smackaroos PER DAY and all by their consent, or aquiescence would be more accurate, usually causes the brain to freeze, they start to silently and inwardly simmer, bring in that the EU is a direct result of Treason and the TV they’re glued to has lied to them since the 70’s about just that, well,  Now your just into boring politics….the same politics that are by design, genociding the very heart of Britain, our people, laws and customs.


My point? I suppose after years of ‘sticking to‘ research that would send insane the likes of said man at said party, I’m used to the ridicule behind my back by those who live in the dark and know nothing of me, simply because of that, they know nothing of me, still they know what’s best for not just me; but humanity, and that’s fine, they’ve always roamed the Earth and always will, let them stab you in the back,  at least you know you’re in front of them, deep down, so do they, the few that truly know me; know without hesitation or doubt, outnumbered a thousand to one I’d stand firm by their side, Mort gage…no thanks…Mort for my beliefs…in a heart beat; lose the fear…we’re a long time underground.

I’ve never liked mushrooms.

Posted in EU, lawful rebellion, Treason, white genocide | Tagged , , , , ,

Jeremy Corbyn: 911…

In politics, nothing happens by accident, if it happens you can bet it was planned that way: F.D.Roosevelt

Posted in 911 | Tagged ,