JFK, The day the illuminati revealed itself

The murder of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy

researched by

Dr. Neville Thomas Jones, Ph.D.


Introduction

On the 22nd November, 1963, the United States President, John F. Kennedy, was murdered in Dallas, Texas. The method of assassination was a single gunshot to the head. Someone travelling in Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson’s car, immediately behind the president’s limousine, was filming the whole thing (as the following still demonstrates)!

(Click the image to view the video.)

 

Lyndon ‘Lyin’ Johnson, as he was called, was a Zionist Jew and became the unelected President of the United States at the instant of the real President’s death. He then made it his top priority to instantly reverse several programmes instigated by President Kennedy; these Kennedy initiatives would have been to the benefit of the American people and the betterment of mankind in general, but were contrary to the interests of Zionism.

Another Jew, Abraham Zapruder, was standing in exactly the right place to capture the murder of President Kennedy on cine film. The Zapruder family subsequently made a fortune selling the rights to this piece of film to the American government.

It is interesting to note that the route of the presidential cavalcade was changed at the last minute to bring JFK along this particular road, so why was Zapruder already set up with his cine camera at this precise spot?

 

The Zapruder film

Using a Bell and Howell 414PD 8mm roll-film movie camera, Zapruder caught the assassination from the side of the limousine closest to the president. The owner’s manual for this model of cine camera quoted the film speed as 16 frames per second (fps). However, the FBI claimed that Zapruder’s camera was running at 18.3 fps in their tests, seemingly confirmed by the camera manufacturers, Bell and Howell (whose independent tests produced a speed of slightly over 18 fps). (Roland Zavada).

Several copies (at least 4) of the film were made by Zapruder, of which one was taken by the FBI.

The film was not seen by the public until twelve years after it was taken, when it was aired on a late-night talk show in America. Today it appears in many places and forms on the Internet (YouTube, for example), and is used here as the basis of the photographic evidence examined.

 

From which direction was JFK shot in the head?

Zapruder frame 313 captures the instant of JFK’s assassination. Analysis of subsequent frames, such as 326 (below), show no sign of any blood, brain tissue or skull fragments on the back seat of the presidential limousine, nor on its boot. From this we deduce that JFK was not shot from the back. Also, if the bullet passed right through his head, as seems almost certain, then, by this lack of morbid debris, he could not have been shot from the front either.

This leaves only three possible directions: from the left side, the right side, or upwards through his head.

 

Exiting projectiles

Viewing Zapruder’s film at normal speed, something flies out upwards and to the right from President Kennedy’s head when he receives the fatal shot. In frames 313 and 314, two distinct projectiles, slightly separated but travelling in the same direction, can clearly be seen. Both of these ejections have flown out of the camera’s field of view by the time that frame 315 is captured.

 

 

The leading projectile, number 1, has travelled (235 – 34) – (146 – 38) pixels in the +ve x-direction and (415 – 110) – (408 – 297) pixels in the +ve y-direction, in the time between these two frames being captured (0.0625s at 16 fps, or 0.0546s at 18.3 fps). I.e., its speed is between 3,442.24 and 3,940.29 pixels per second.

President Kennedy was 6’1″ tall (Wallechinsky & Wallace). Using the full-length photo of JFK in Berlin (Freie Universitaet, 26th June, 1963), and having calculated the line AB in frame 313 to be 30.23 pixels, it can be shown that the projectile material was leaving the top of President Kennedy’s head at a minimum* speed of between 31.6 and 36.2 metres per second (equivalent to between 104 and 119 ft/s).

* This is a minimum value because frames 313 and 314 are two-dimensional images providing no depth information.

Smoke

Frames 312 to 317, inclusive, of the Zapruder film are reproduced here, having been contrast-enhanced and converted to greyscale images, in order to highlight a definite puff of smoke right next to the left side of the President’s head.

The smoke rapidly expands and dissipates in about 3 tenths of a second (0.2732s at 18.3 fps and 0.3125s at 16 fps), being just discernable in the last frame of this sequence.

Material from the head wound has exited at high speed, as we have observed, and would not wispily linger in the air as smoke does. Moreover, it is evident that this smoke has an initial component of velocity in the horizontal direction equal to that of the limousine and that this component is slowed by air resistance (compare the expanding smoke cloud with the white object on the lawn and with the fixed features of the president’s car, such as the top of the rear seat). The separation between the smoke cloud and the white object on the grass decreases at a rate that is very slightly less than the rate at which the white object is perceived to travel with respect to the limousine.

Neither John nor Jackie Kennedy are smoking a cigarette. The smoke has been caused by some explosive reaction, such as the detonation of a firearm cartridge. Such smoke remains where the gun is; it does not travel with the bullet. The fact that this smoke appears in the sequence at the same time as the fatal injury, and that it emanates from the left-hand-side of JFK’s head, where Jackie Kennedy has positioned herself, means that President Kennedy was killed by his wife.

I am not the first to reach this conclusion. This view is shared by someone calling themselves ‘Nohup’ who, in a public forum on 3rd April 2008, wrote “After studying the Zapruder film for nearly 20 years, I’ve come to the conclusion that the only person verified to have the access and angle to have delivered the fatal gunshot to JFK was Jackie Kennedy. The telltale sign is right before his head explodes, where she moves forward with something in her hand.”

That JFK was shot at point blank range from the lower left side of his head is also supported by the amount and distribution of blood on JFK’s shirt, as photographed from the back,

 

And from the front,

 

The so-called bullet hole is no such thing; it seems to have been hastily made by snipping along three sides with scissors and then tearing the resulting flap of material off. Notice, for instance, how the rightmost snip extends a little way past the start of the topmost snip which, in turn, extends slightly past the top of the leftmost snip:

 

There is no doubt, if one studies the Zapruder film running at normal speed, that Mrs. Kennedy seems to whip something quickly away after her husband is shot, before she clambers out onto the boot. (Johnson had the whole of the presidential limousine immediately ripped out and shredded, before having the car re-fitted and using it for himself.)

In the next animated gif, produced by the author in October 2009 and uploaded on 13th October 2009, Jacqueline Kennedy’s actions at the instant of her husband’s fatal gunshot wound are very clearly seen …

Jackie Kennedy

Mrs. Jacqueline Kennedy (née Bouvier) was a Jewess, a fact well hidden, but revealed by her cousin/step-brother, Gore Vidal, in his autobiography:

“… the ethnic surprise buried deep inside Gore Vidal’s much-hyped autobiography, … ‘Palimpsest: A Memoir,’ … [is that Jackie Kennedy’s] mother, Janet, was Jewish. Janet, who had Jackie with her husband John ‘Black Jack’ Bouvier, eventually divorced him and married Hugh Auchincloss, who was also Vidal’s stepfather.

“In the book, … Vidal offhandedly writes on page 372, ‘One should note that the first of Hughdie’s (Hugh Dudley Auchincloss) three high-powered wives was Russian, the second my mother, the third Jackie’s mother, Janet, born Lee or, as my mother used to observe thoughtfully, Levy.’ Vidal continues, ‘Apparently, Janet’s father had changed his name in order to become the first Jew to be a vice president of the Morgan bank. My mother wondered how Hughdie, a quiet but sincere anti-Semite, would respond when he found out.’ As for Janet Lee, he writes she used to say she was ‘of the Virginia Lees’…until the real Lees ordered her to shut up.’…” (Ahmed Rami quoting from the New York Post of 9th November, 1995.)

Peter Kurth during his very brief review of Christopher Andersen’s book, “Jackie After Jack,” writes: “America’s grieving first widow, during those terrible Four Days in November, was chain-smoking Salems and shot up on speed. She was also entertaining everyone in earshot with the grisly details of Kennedy’s death, compelled … to describe the way his head blew off in her lap, how she tried to stick the skull back on in the hope it would keep him alive, how Texas Gov. John Connally was ‘squealing like a stuck pig,’ etc. (For the record, she did not remember trying to crawl out of the car.)”

 

The weapon

According to his long-term mistress, who bore him a son, Johnson was sure the day before this atrocity took place that President J.F. Kennedy was going to be killed whilst being driven through Dallas. This implies that he knew there would be no untoward problem with the assassin, since she would be right next to her victim. However, a sophisticated weapon, such as a Smith & Wesson semi-automatic handgun, could quite possibly jam at the predetermined moment, spoiling Johnson’s (and his backers, including Aristotle Onassis) murderous plan. At such close range, however, a simple, crude pistol would be all that was required.

Something like this Deringer (more often spelt with a double ‘r’) would thus have been chosen; an extremely simple, easily concealed, one shot, miniture cannon.

“The .41 rimfire cartridge was created for use in small Derringer type pistols. The .41 rimfire round was very slow, 13 grains of black powder propelling a 130 grain lead bullet at 425 feet per second, yielding a muzzle energy of 52 ft lb.” (Cushman). This would be more than capable of taking part of President Kennedy’s skull off, as Mrs. Kennedy implies.

If the leading projectile captured in frames 313 and 314 of Zapruder’s cine film was indeed the bullet from a .41 calibre rimfire cartridge, then its analysed speed of at least 104-119 ft/s is commensurate with an accelerated lump of lead that has lost kinetic energy during its passage through human tissue, and in particular in breaking through the top of the skull.

Just such a single shot, .41 calibre pistol was used to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, again at point-blank range, again by his wife, and again with the blame attached to some patsie. How Zionists seem to revel in this sort of obscene deception and repetition.

Look again at frame 326, above. Does this small-barrelled pistol not remarkably resemble what Jacqueline Kennedy seems to be holding in her right hand?

 

Incapacitation

Obviously Jacqueline Kennedy could not just produce a gun and shoot her husband from point blank range in broad daylight, at least not with any degree of certainty. Who knows where he would be looking at the designated time and place, and the type of weapon identified here only has one bullet in the chamber.

Solution? He had to be incapacitated in a way that was sure and precise, such that he was unable to react.

When viewing the Zapruder film it is easily seen that John Kennedy is smiling and waving to people along the roadside as his limousine starts to be obscured by the street sign, but is suffering pain and discomfort of the upper respiratory tract as he comes back into view at the rightmost edge of the sign.

Whatever effect has caused this change has happened between frames 206 and 221, inclusive, and by frame 230 (below) the President is in clear distress.

This problem very rapidly takes hold, as captured in frames 237:

 

240:

 

243:

 

and 246:

 

And he becomes completely incapacitated by frame 254:

 

We can work out the minimum and maximum time involved from these observations. The minimum time is obtained by assuming (254 – 221) frames at 18.3 fps and the maximum time by assuming (254 – 206) frames at 16 fps. Hence, from the onset of pain until incapacitation must have taken from 1.8 to 3.0 seconds. This is very rapid. It is also not caused by a bullet wound, as the official storyline goes, because there is no blood, no violent lurching of the body, no concern on Mrs. Kennedy’s face, no concern on Connally’s face (when he turns around) and no attempt by John Kennedy to dive for cover or to protect his wife.

Mrs. Kennedy keeps her full attention on Governor Connally from frame 255, when he starts to look behind, up to and including frame 291, when he looks away. This corresponds to a time span of between 2.0 and 2.3 seconds. Not long, but long enough for Connally to ascertain that JFK is fully incapacitated and to give the signal to Jacqueline Kennedy.

For example, frame 262:

 

and frame 274:

 

In frame 274, above, she definitely seems to be waiting for the okay from Connally.

She then begins her preparations to murder her husband from frame 292. Here is frame 294:

 

Note in particular that up until this point Jacqueline Kennedy had kept as much distance as possible from her clearly distressed husband, keeping him at bay with her gloved hands.

The point where President Kennedy was to be sacrificed had been marked out. The big, black man in the foreground, seen in several of the above frames, positioned to the right of the sign, with his right arm extended was probably the marker for the car to slow down almost to a standstill (a cine film taken from the other side of the car distinctly shows how slow the car was going from the sign to the murder spot), someone then disabled the victim via a remote, electronic trigger, Connally examined the extent of incapacity and then Jacqueline Kennedy, once given the nod by Connally, immediately placed the gun in the predetermined position and discharged the chamber through her husband’s head. All of it to be captured on Abraham Zapruder’s film for later gleeful gloating, with other films being taken to be sure of having a record of this extreme baseness from every possible angle. (In fact, Zapruder almost did misalign his camera, getting the car right down at the bottom edge of the emulsion for a while.)

As for who had the electronic trigger, a strong possibility is that it was the passenger next to the driver of President Kennedy’s limousine, since he had a view of the human marker in front of him and of President Kennedy, by way of the door mirror, behind him. The transmitter would be wired into the passenger door and would have been powered by the car’s battery for very high signal strength.

Then the cavalcade speeds up and takes the victim straight to the “hospital,” where John Kennedy could be pronounced dead (after keeping the American people in hope and suspense for some predetermined length of time).

So, how could they incapacitate the president? The answer lies with Connally.

 

Nerve agents

President Kennedy’s reaction is not that of a victim of a gunshot or an electric shock, but that of someone who has been exposed to a lachrymatory agent (or lachrymator). These cause difficulty in breathing, paralysis and general respiratory discomfort. Even relatively mild ones can be very fast acting: “Tear gas is so fast-acting it’s amazing. It affects your throat more than it affects your eyes, in fact. I honestly felt like if I didn’t drink something my throat was literally going to fall out of my body.” (Source.)

There were many chemical and/or biological agents known to research laboratories and the military, even back in 1963. These are classified in various categories, three of which are the harassing agents (such as CN and CS gas), blister agents (such as mustard gas) and nerve agents (such as sarin – discovered in 1939 – and tabun).

They are all incapacitating in nature and their characteristics depend upon the type of agent, the concentration and the method of dissemination. “Usefulness,” in the military sense of the word, depends upon the time taken to have the desired effect, the predictability of behaviour and the antidotes available for friendly personnel.

There is insufficient information available to the public to be able to identify which agent was used to incapacitate John F. Kennedy, but we can narrow the field down a little.

Blister vesicants, such as mustard gas, burn the skin and respiratory tract, but can be ruled out because their effects do not manifest themselves until long after exposure.

Harassing gases or sprays can be eliminated, since they would be highly likely to incapacitate Jacqueline Kennedy as well, and would not render the victim totally incapable or unaware.

An agent which is liquid in its normal state, highly incapacitating, very rapid in taking effect, safe to handle (constituents being kept apart) and for which antidotes are available, would be needed.

A nerve agent developed by the British at Porton Down Chemical Weapons Research Centre between 1952 and 1954, subsequently called VX gas after its production technology was traded with the Americans in return for nuclear weapons secrets, or one of the variants thereof, is a distinct possibility. Although called a gas, it is actually a clear, odourless liquid at room temperature.

A stronger candidate though is cyclosarin, cyclohexyl methylphosphonofluoridate (or GF). This is a colourless and odourless liquid at room temperature in its pure form, which is highly persistent (i.e., gives off almost no vapour) and is highly toxic when absorbed through the skin. It was initially developed by Germany in the Second World War (not used by them) and then further studied and developed by both Britain and the United States in the early 1950s.

It was necessary to get the liquid nerve agent onto JFK’s skin and to facilitate this the murderers made use of the fact that President Kennedy had a long-term back problem and always wore a steel-boned brace. The following two sets of photos purport to show this contraption after it had been taken off his body. They cannot be showing the original, of course, since there is no blood on the material. It is more likely that they are photos of one of JFK’s bona fide back supports (probably off Air Force One). Special precautions would have been necessary to remove and dispose of the one he was actually wearing.

 

 

The agent would be stored in the girdle as two precursors, separated until required to be combined. To quote Wikipedia, “A cyclosarin binary weapon would most likely contain methylphosphonyl difluoride in one capsule, with the other capsule containing either cyclohexanol or a mixture of cyclohexylamine and cyclohexanol.”

Two small vials of the chemical precursors would have been stitched into the corset, together with the battery and the method of breaking the vial(s). John Kennedy was used to having steel rods in his back support and would never have noticed any difference with this one. He was probably helped into it on the airplane.

The median lethal dose (referred to by the designation, LD50) necessary to kill a person of around 90kg would be 31.5g by percutaneous (through the skin) delivery (at 0.35mg/kg – source), and I would think it highly likely that this would have been roughly the quantity used, since one way or another (i.e., outside the “hospital” or inside it), President Kennedy’s fate was sealed as soon as that device deposited the nerve agent onto his skin. Also, death would follow such a dose within 15 minutes, but the higher the initial dosage, the faster the incapacitation would occur and the quicker John Kennedy could be killed (by a bullet).

John Bowden Connally, Jr., a Johnson supporter and leader of the Johnson presidential campaign at the 1960 Democratic convention in Los Angeles, was named Secretary of the United States Navy (by President Kennedy) in 1961 and directed the Sixth Fleet in the Mediterranean Sea. Although resigning from the navy to run for governorship of Texas, he would have been well used to (and privy to) all the nerve agent testing information that the navy had been doing, including personal observation of effectiveness and reaction times on actual subjects.

The urgent need to bleach and then incinerate the actual back support cut from JFK’s body, not only due to the residual nerve agent present, but also to destroy the vials and electromechanical circuitry, explains why we get photos of JFK’s shirt, but not of the brace that he wore that day.

The only thing that the U.S. Navy man, John Connally, had to ensure was that JFK did indeed have the back-support brace on. How would Connally ensure this to his satisfaction, since he had not been on the plane with the presidential party? That’s easy. How would you do that if you were in his position as the Governor of Texas? Just feel for it, using the pretext of giving the victim a friendly stroke on the back.

This animated gif was created with frames extracted from a video that is up on YouTube (these frames start at 2 minutes 41 seconds into the film).

Connally, having assurred himself that the David-ben-Gurion-ordered “wet op” (U.S. Navy parlance for a bloody assassination) to remove “an enemy of Israel” was going according to the detailed plan that he, Johnson and Aristotle Onassis had devised and rehearsed during the three months that Jacqueline Kennedy was on holiday with Aristotle Onassis (against her husband’s wishes and advice, by the way), then sits in the car, waits for the signal during the trip along the appropriate road, checks the effectiveness of the nerve agent used and, when Kennedy is displaying the symptoms that Connally would recognize from navy experiments, gives the nod to Mrs. Kennedy before turning away again and waiting for the shot.

 

Mrs. Kennedy was wearing white gloves, to ensure no chance of touching the liquid, and had probably had a prior intravenous injection of 2mg of atropine sulfate, to cover the very small risk that she might be exposed to a tiny amount of vapour (was this the reason for pushing her husband disdainfully away and clambering out onto the boot?).

The boot-clambering incident excluded, all of this was meticulously planned to sacrificially murder a decent, naïve family man in broad daylight, just minutes after he had happily disembarked from Air Force One at Love Field Airport, Dallas.

John Kennedy was flown in, murdered within minutes and flown out, rather like a meat packaging plant operation.

 

 

Conclusions

How do you ensure that ‘Lyin’ Johnson is not shot? You do not shoot JFK from the front, because Johnson was travelling in the car behind. How do you ensure that Jewess Jacqueline Kennedy is not shot? You do not fire from either side, nor from the front or back. How do you ensure that President Kennedy is killed? You have to shoot him in the head from very close range. When a shot is fired from a gun, where is the smoke from the gunpowder? At the place of firing.

Only 1 hour 38 minutes later that same day, 22nd November 1963, on board Air Force One, Johnson was sworn in as U.S. President in his home state of Texas, with a composed Jewess, Jacqueline Bouvier, faithfully by his left side and another Jewess (Johnson’s wife, Ladybug) on his right side.

Congress’man’ Albert Thomas perhaps knows more than a little about this plan, as he winks at smilin’ ‘Lyin’ Johnson. Mrs. Kennedy has maybe a twinge of remorse here, but Ladybug Johnson appears satisfied with the day’s events (like her husband, Ladybug was a rabid Zionist).

“Congressman Johnson used legal and sometimes illegal methods to smuggle hundreds of Jews into Texas, using Galveston as the entry port. … Johnson smuggled boatloads and planeloads of Jews into Texas.” (Source.)

“It is interesting, but not surprising, to note that in all the words written and uttered about the Kennedy assassination, Israel’s intelligence service agency, the Mossad, has never been mentioned. And yet a Mossad motive is obvious. On this question, as on almost all others, American reporters cannot bring themselves to cast Israel in an unfavourable light – despite the fact that Mossad complicity is as plausible as any of the other theories.” – US Representative Paul Findley, March 1992.

As recorded in the Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States, John F. Kennedy was completely against nuclear weapons technology falling into the hands of the Israelis: “Personally I am haunted by the feeling that by 1970, unless we are successful, there may be ten nuclear powers instead of four, and by 1975, 15 to 20. … I see the possibility in the 1970s of the president of the United States having to face a world in which 15 or 25 nations may have these weapons. I regard this as the greatest possible danger and hazard.”

From an article on jewwatch.com, quote: “His [JFK’s] personal commitment is apparent in the way he dealt with the Israeli nuclear issue after he assumed office on January 20, 1961. Only ten days later, Secretary of State Dean Rusk gave the president a secret two-page memo on Israel’s atomic activities, which noted the ‘categoric assurances’ obtained from Ben Gurion ‘that Israel does not have plans for developing atomic weaponry.’

David ben Gurion was nothing more than a dangerous, pathological liar and terrorist. John Kennedy maybe did not see this in 1961, but was almost certainly aware of it by mid-1963. President John F. Kennedy tried to stop Israel from starting a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. In a June 1963 letter to Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, he insisted on proof “beyond a reasonable doubt” that Israel was not developing nuclear weapons at its Dimona reactor facility. Though his letter was cabled to the U.S. embassy, Ben-Gurion resigned (citing undisclosed personal reasons) before the message could be physically delivered.

Lyndon ‘Lyin’ Johnson was a Zionist and hence favourable to Ezra-hell (nuclear weapons of mass destruction given to the enemies of humanity, prolonging and escalating the Vietnam war, allowing the Federal Reserve Bank scam to continue, etc.), whereas President John F. Kennedy saw the Zionist entity for what it is and would have curbed its power and influence (no nuclear weapons allowed to the enemies of humanity, an end to the Vietnam war, abolition of the Federal Reserve Bank, dismantling of the CIA, etc.)

The evidence contained within Zapruder’s movie points to the murderess being John Kennedy’s own wife, Jacqueline, who placed a small handgun either under JFK’s chin or just below his left ear and fired a single, low velocity bullet straight up through his brain.

Johnson & Co. made sure that they captured this moment, by having it filmed from three different perspectives. (There are other films in existence.)

The extent to which the Zionists ensured that this heinous crime against a decent family man was caught on cine film gives some insight into their depraved and spiritually dead minds. No doubt this assassination is gleefully watched by the offspring of the Devil, behind closed doors, to this day.

Notice, for instance, a couple of similarly-dressed men, marked ‘A’ and ‘B’ (with an equipment bag, marked ‘C’), who are almost certainly CIA operatives. President Kennedy is shot in the head right before their eyes, but they do not even flinch, because they are there to document the event, just as the Dancing Israelis were there in New York City to document the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers at the World Trade Centre (as discussed elsewhere on this web site).

Where is their film?

Why were they already set up there, just like Zapruder was, along a street that President Kennedy was not scheduled to go down?

In answer to these questions and in line with the facts presented here, I contend that President John F. Kennedy, arguably the finest United States president of all time, was murdered by David ben Gurion, Lyndon ‘Lyin’ Johnson, Aristotle Onassis, John Connally and the one who actually pulled the trigger … Jacqueline Kennedy, née Bouvier.

 

References

Cushman, D.A., 2008, “Single shot Pistols and Derringers,” accessed 2nd September 2008.

Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: John F. Kennedy, 1964, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., p. 280.

Rami, A., 2003, “1000 Quotes by and about Jews,” numbers 301-350, accessed 1st September 2008.

Zavada, R.J., 1998, “Dissecting the Zapruder Bell & Howell 8mm Movie Camera,” accessed 1st September 2008.

 

Credits

This research stemmed from an e-mail discussion between myself and Bernie Brauer of Canada. I am indebited to Bernie for his encouragement, opinions, support and enthusiasm.

 

Additional Information

The bulk of this analysis went live on the Internet on 2nd September 2008, but I have since been stimulated into further research on this topic by some of the possibilities discussed on a David Icke forum that was started on 26th July 2009.

 

Some interesting supportive material has been collected by someone called “JR” in an article entitled, Jewess Jacqueline Kennedy Kills JFK.

 

On the 8th January 2009, Bernie drew my attention to a blog on abovetopsecret.com which was started on 2nd November 2007. An extract of the initial posting is as follows (with slight corrections for spelling mistakes, etc.) …

“I got talking to an old American guy tonight in an old London pub. He was a normal, likeable chap who seemed very honest and proud of his work; he didn’t seem like a liar and was quite humble and quiet as we chatted.

“He claimed he worked for the CIA from 1960 to ’69 … I’d say he was about 80ish.

“He quickly changed the subject [of conversation] to the JFK assassination and stated Jackie shot him with a small weapon that was hidden up her sleeve.

“He said she was an MK-ultra victim and the best way to take him out ‘was in full view to dazzle the spectators, in plain view’.

“He said it was captured in the Zapruder film and was amazed it still hasn’t been spotted.

 

“It was a kind of weird conversation; he wasn’t drunk as he was drinking pints of water! Then he left … quickly and silently without even a goodbye. I’m still kinda spooked!

“What freaks me out mostly is he was smoking a really fat cigar and the people behind the bar didn’t even bat an eyelid. I tried to have a cigarette with him but was promptly told to go to the garden! Almost like he owned the place, or was invisible to the new smoking laws!

“Creepy.”


Advertisements

About Duncan:

reclaim your Sovereignty,
This entry was posted in jfk, Mind Wars and Psyops and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to JFK, The day the illuminati revealed itself

  1. Duncan: says:

    Reblogged this on Iceni Rising and commented:

    In reblogging, I saw all the pics have vanished from this post, funny that.

  2. get download says:

    fantastic issues altogether, you just gained a new reader. What may you recommend about your put up that you just made a few days ago? Any positive?

  3. Steve Louden says:

    It constantly amazes me how people who don’t know the first thing about ballistics of forensics always claim that the shot that killed President Kennedy came from everywhere but from where it came. Behind the limousine. Here we have yet another one making all kinds of false claims about the head matter that exited the great man’s head. They totally ignore the fact that the occupants in the vehicle who were seated to the front of the president were struck with the majority of the head debris, i.e. blood and brain, and also they ignore the fact that several skull fragments found outside the limousine (and accounted for) all landed several yards ahead of where the car was located at the time of the fatal shot. Not one of those skull fragments were discovered to the rear of where the vehicle was at the time of the fatal shot. The only debris discovered to the rear or left of the vehicle was the “tiny droplets/bits of blood and other matter” which landed on the two motorcycle police officers who were riding to the left rear of President Kennedy as they rode into it, as evidenced by the Zapruder film and their own testimony. There were no large skull fragments that struck either police officer and no “mass quantities” of blood or brain matter. So, to those who make these outlandish claims that the shot that killed the president came from any location besides the rear, you are all full of hot air.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s