This past week (October 24, 2014), President Putin of Russia gave a keynote speech at The Valdai Club, one of Russia’s most prestigious “think tank” organizations. . 108 experts, historians and political analysts from 25 countries, including 62 foreign participants, took part in the gathering which held as its theme for this year, “The World Order: New Rules or a Game without Rules“.
President Putin often commented about the need to speak “frankly” and without couching the discussion in diplomatic terms:
Some of what I say might seem a bit too harsh, but if we do not speak directly and honestly about what we really think, then there is little point in even meeting in this way. It would be better in that case just to keep to diplomatic get-togethers, where no one says anything of real sense and, recalling the words of one famous diplomat, you realise that diplomats have tongues so as not to speak the truth.
The discussion, although refreshingly frank, could have gone a bit “diplomatically” further in really speaking about some rather overt truths apparent to many of us observe and have first hand experience with the “American” political scene.
Consequently, what follows is an even more frank elucidation of just what President Putin could have said in a no holds barred discussion. This is not to imply that what follows is necessarily what President Putin “thinks” or “believes”, but the rhetoric is sure to make sense to many independently aware observers of the current American and geopolitical scene.
The Conference Theme: The World Order: New Rules or a Game without Rules
The title of the conference was rather telling: the gathering was to discuss the current global order and the dynamics and forces that exist which create the current macro conditions of the existing global order.
Here in the West, we hear much about “The New World Order”, which many of us view as a Talmudic top down tyrannical system. In such a system, the ruling elite, being “Jewish” in the classical use of the word, care nothing for humanity and “rule of law” is a concept that only applies when the law suits the ruling Jewish power structures.
When the laws hinder the agenda of the ruling Jewish power structures, the laws are simply caste aside as being old and irrelevant. Who remembers the comments from former President Bush, whether real or imagined, about the Constition of the United States being a “God damned piece of paper“?
Said Putin regarding the total lawlessness of Jewish “Neocons” in power in Washington:
This (the establishment of a Unipolar power centered world) created the impression that the so-called ‘victors’ in the Cold War had decided to pressure events and reshape the world to suit their own needs and interests. If the existing system of international relations, international law and the checks and balances in place got in the way of these aims, this system was declared worthless, outdated and in need of immediate demolition.
Added President Putin:
Let me stress that the solidity of the system created back then rested not only on the balance of power and the rights of the victor countries, but on the fact that this system’s ‘founding fathers’ had respect for each other, did not try to put the squeeze on others, but attempted to reach agreements. – source
Here, we may defer to a sport analogy. There is “winning”, and there is such a thing as “winning graciously”. Older generations might use the phrase, “There but by the grace of God go I.”, but there was always this ingrained strain of thought within Western thinking, linked perhaps to chivalry, wherein the victor and opponent fought tenaciously, but when the fight was over, there was always a place at the table for the vanquished.
Ideas of “win” but “don’t humiliate your opponent”, or “never rub it in”, a reference to magnifying the emotional duress of the defeated, were a part of Western idealism.
The idea of respecting one’s opponents perhaps finds its way into a modern day expression of the “Hockey Hand Shake” ritual, where the combatants for the Stanley Cup take time after the fate of the Stanley Cup has been decided to “shake hands”.
We fight for our belief in what is right, but when it is all decided, it is time to mend the fences and build some mutual respect and prosperity.
None of these chivalrous ideas are present within Jewish Talmudic norms. “Victory” in the Jewish sense is predicated on total subjugation and humiliation of one’s opponent, and doing so the point of absolute destruction of the opponents desire to ever rise back up again.
Judaism, Talmudism, or whatever label you wish to affix to this disease of the human spirit, has no equal for barbarity on planet Earth. Hence we saw after World War II the absolute cruelty of Jewish elites who sought to literally force the German people off the face of the Earth, while Western (Anglo-Saxon) forces put forward the “Marshall Plan” for not just Germany, but Japan as well.
There remained in the past a level of mutual respect which is totally absent in a Talmudic “Jewish” foreign policy.
Coercion and Force
The measures taken against those who refuse to submit are well-known and have been tried and tested many times. They include use of force, economic and propaganda pressure, meddling in domestic affairs, and appeals to a kind of ‘supra-legal’ legitimacy when they need to justify illegal intervention in this or that conflict or toppling inconvenient regimes. Of late, we have increasing evidence too that outright blackmail has been used with regard to a number of leaders. It is not for nothing that ‘big brother’ is spending billions of dollars on keeping the whole world, including its own closest allies, under surveillance.
Within Jewish social constructions, there is no such thing as “freedom of thought”, “freedom of speech”, or “freedom of expression”. There are no such things as “human rights”, “Universal rights” – what exists is a “Master-slave” relationship. Jewish power politics is all about “Total Spectrum Domination” to the point of total humiliation and subservience.
When Putin speaks about current American “policy makers” as appealing to some “supra-legal” legitimacy, it could be easier to understand the Talmudic/Noahidist strain that dominates American foreign policy. Jewish control of American foreign policy is straight out of the Protocols of Zion,
Our right lies in force. The word “right” is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you.Where does right begin? Where does it end?
Because Jews have come to dominate US foreign policy projection, and there has been no credible force to counter Jewish control of America’s vast economic and military power structures, there is no in the minds of Jews to impose any restraints on their lust to attain their goals.
Terror and 9-11
The West if not supported, at least closed its eyes, and, I would say, gave information, political and financial support to international terrorists’ invasion of Russia (we have not forgotten this) and the Central Asian region’s countries. Only after horrific terrorist attacks were committed on US soil itself did the United States wake up to the common threat of terrorism.
Putin, here, is either incredibly disinformed, or he is openly supporting a global “elite narrative” as to what exactly transpired in the United States on “9-11″. Whereas Putin seems to be saying that the Chechnya crisis in the Caucasus was brought about my Western meddling, a distinct probability, Putin is way off the mark on “9-11″: the very people Putin is targeting in his speech are the same extended group responsible for the activities that was 9-11.
9-11 was simply the codification and consolidation of coup d’etat in the United States, and the world has been dealing with this reality ever since.
Financing of International “Terrorism”
As for financing sources, today, the money is coming not just from drugs, production of which has increased not just by a few percentage points but many-fold, since the international coalition forces have been present in Afghanistan. You are aware of this. The terrorists are getting money from selling oil too. Oil is produced in territory controlled by the terrorists, who sell it at dumping prices, produce it and transport it. But someone buys this oil, resells it, and makes a profit from it, not thinking about the fact that they are thus financing terrorists who could come sooner or later to their own soil and sow destruction in their own countries.
Here, Putin hits on a vital issue: who is conducting the financing of these mercenary armies that operate under various “Islamic front flags”. Again, the financing through the use of drugs such as opium in Afghanistan can only be brought about by even deeper “clandestine” state agency operation and co-ordination. Hence photos of American soldiers appearing to be “guarding” opium fields in Afghanistan are probably quite close to reality: the US military is guarding the production of opium and hence it should be viewed that one of the reasons for the Americans to be in Afghanistan is partially for control of the opium trade.
Illicit oil from Syria and quasi illicit oil from Iraq all point to a level of sophistication that can only be viewed as being part of “state actors”.
It is naive to think that you can just park an oil tanker in Turkey and fill up the cargo holds with oil and governments not know precisely what is going on relative to the source of the oil.
Essentially, the unipolar world is simply a means of justifying dictatorship over people and countries.
This is, of course, the whole idea and is straight to the point. From a Russian and global perspective, it is enough to point out the nations responsible for the destruction of all existing institutions of global law and order, but as Putin points out, the extrication of America and the West from these agents of darkness is the responsibility of the nations that are under Talmudic domination.