Blow up Parliament: Stop paying Tax.
Blow up Parliament: Stop paying Tax.
Just quickly: When others say; ” we shouldn’t attack others” or ” that’s just infighting” or “we’re in this together”…When this country, indeed most if not all of the west has the enemy inside the gates, Are we supposed to let sayanim, knowing or otherwise, away with their antics?
I didn’t believe Albert Burgess was intentionally misleading the truth movement in this country as are I believe, that little clique. In researching recently for a book I started 3 or 4 years ago that’s just sat in a draw since, I discovered that in Burgess’ book: The Laymans Guide To The English Constitution, Albert misses out English kings and events very much relevant to any ‘Laymans guide’.
From my book…one day….
Albert Burgess in his book: Laymans Guide To The English Constitution, mentions the ealdorman as an eldery man who, “could not or would not learn, would be replaced by a younger man”, Burgess, again oddly to me at least, also jumps from Henry III to Edward II, why miss out the King who formed the first modern parliament, who brought the knights, clergy, nobility, as well as the lords and commons together for the first time, he defeated the Welsh and was known as the ‘Hammer of the Scots’, he was a statesman, a lawyer and a soldier? Now I’m not bigging him up, this is longshanks of Braveheart infamy (Hollywood I know, we’ll get to that) but yes, the English did some terrible stuff to the other peoples of these isles, no nation in history has been saintly, but when you intend to lead the charge against the traitors in Britain today, Burgess ought to be a bit more precise and objective; missing out Ed I was a mistake? I think not.
Staying with said book, it also manages to jump from Henry I ( 1100- 1135) to John (1213) missing out Stephen (1135-1154) and again coincidentally misses out Henry II (1135-1189), nearly 80 years of monarchs and related history bypassed, so ‘Laymans’ guide seems almost a euphamism.
During those missing years the ‘Layman’ may not know under the reign of Stephen: regarded by historians as a weak king, there was civil war throughout his reign, during this hegelian conundrum , jews; who Stephen had a fondness for, flourished; communities grew in Norwich, Cambridge and Oxford. Again under Henry II, Albert Burgess’ other missing monarch; jewish communities were found at Lincoln, Northampton, Thetford and Bungay, in Gloucestershire, Hampshire and Wiltshire, London, Norwich, Cambridge and Oxford, (See From Domesday Book to Magna Carta,)
By the time of Henry III, jews and their hatred of Christians,usury, coin clipping and lest we forget; child sacrifice, had spread to include: Bristol, Canterbury, Colchester, Exeter, Hereford, Stamford, Winchester and York, (This is proved by Transactions, xi 99-111, Jewish Hist. Soc., which were lists of taxation of Jews.) and (Geoffrey H Smith and Arnold S Leese)
Perhaps Albert decided the layman didn’t need to know those facts, or that Edward I, just a minor point; expelled the jews from Britain with the Edict of Expulsion of 1290?: Update for the Layman; The edict still stands!
William the Conqueror, aka: William the Bastard, with this battle of Britain by defeating Harold at Hastings in 1066, was an invasion of jews from Normandy. In todays cultural marxist politically correct world, to say such is ‘anti-semitic’ or ‘racist’, convenient don’t you think!
Never the less true: There is little evidence to suggest that Jews settled in England in any large numbers until after the Norman Conquest. It was in Normandy, at Rouen, that a large Jewish community had existed since the Gallo-Roman era (see Gesta Regum Anglorum ii, 371n). William of Malmesbury stated that the Conqueror brought the Jews of London from Rouen. Thus it was armed might, not democracy, which led to England being occupied by Jews.(Geoffrey H Smith and Arnold S Leese)
Burgess’ William the Conqueror is a different beast: “ William chose to maintain the Laws of Edward the Confessor (which were Alfred’s Laws), rather than introduce laws from his native Country of Normandy” (page 4)
Other sources would beg to differ from Burgess’ convenient perceptions including myself, and though I hate to admit it; Wikipedia: The first Jewish communities of significant size came to England with William the Conqueror in 1066. On the conquest of England, William instituted a feudal system in the country, whereby all estates formally belonged to the Crown; the king then appointed lords over these vast estates, but they were subject to duties and obligations (financial and military) to the king. Under the lords were further subjects such as serfs, who were bound and obliged to their lords, and their lords’ obligations. Merchants had a special status in the system as did Jews. Jews were declared to be direct subjects of the King, unlike the rest of the population. This was an ambivalent legal position for the Jewish population, in that they were not tied to any particular lord, but were subject to the whims of the king. This could at times prove advantageous and at other times disadvantageous. Every successive King formally reviewed a royal charter granting Jews the right to remain in England. Jews did not enjoy any of the guarantees of Magna Carta of 1215.
Coincidentally of course; Albert also forgets to mention one English Civil war and one Oliver Cromwell, who also happened to let the chosen ones back into England.
Funny that, dontcha think?
“These [common law] rights consist, primarily, in the free enjoyment of personal security, of personal liberty and of private property…to vindicate these rights when actually violated or attacked, the subjects of England are entitled, in the first place, to the regular administration and free course of justice in the courts of law; next to the right of petitioning the king and parliament for redress of grievances and lastly, to the right of having and using arms for self preservation and defence.”
“Commentaries on the Laws of England”
Lord Justice William Blackstone
The publication in 1972 of Firearms Control, by Chief Inspector (later Superintendent) Colin Greenwood, of the West Yorkshire Constabulary, was a landmark in the study of the law relating to firearms and its effects in England and Wales. Based on his research at Cambridge University, Superintendent Greenwood, who is now editor of Guns Review, demonstrated for the first time how the right of the individual to own firearms was firmly embedded in British law, and that the level of armed crime was far lower before the restrictions imposed by the Firearms Act 1920 and subsequent legislation than it was afterwards.
Every place that has been banned guns has seen murder rates go up. You cannot point to one place where murder rates have fallen, whether it’s Chicago or D.C. or even island nations such as England, Jamaica, or Ireland.
For an example of homicide rates before and after a ban, take the case of the handgun ban in England and Wales in January 1997 (source here see Table 1.01 and the column marked “Offences currently recorded as homicide per million population”). After the ban, clearly homicide rates bounce around over time, but there is only one year (2010) where the homicide rate is lower than it was in 1996. The immediate effect was about a 50 percent increase in homicide rates. The homicide rate only began falling when there was a large increase in the number of police officers during 2003 and 2004. Despite the huge increase in the number of police, the murder rate still remained slightly higher than the immediate pre-ban rate.
Released Cabinet papers, and the diaries of the then Cabinet secretary, reveal that although the government of the day claimed to be introducing the Firearms Act 1920 as a measure to control armed crime, the Cabinet’s real purpose was to prevent the workers from obtaining firearms in what it believed was an imminent Bolshevik uprising. Before 1920, the right of the individual to own firearms was firmly established in law, reaffirmed in such documents as the Bill of Rights of 1689 and Sir William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765), and successfully defended by members of Parliament throughout the 19th century. During the “Tottenham outrage” of 1909, for instance, two Russian socialist-anarchists carried out a wages robbery, shot dead a policeman and a 10-year-old boy, and were pursued by armed citizens and the police, who borrowed at least four pistols from passers-by. (One robber shot himself, the other hid in a cottage where he either shot himself or was killed by the police.) Even under the 1920 Act, and in the 1937 Home Office Memorandum of Guidance on the Implementation of the Firearms Act, personal protection was recognised as a “good reason” for the issuance of a firearms certificate. Although in 1946 the Home Secretary, James Chuter Ede, stated that self-defence was no longer an acceptable reason, as recently as 1979, Clement Freud, Liberal MP, told the Commons that
It is important on the grounds of security to bear in mind that the more people can learn about the use of firearms, the safer, and not the less safe, this country will be….The more people can be encouraged legally to use firearms, the safer and not the less safe will this country be. (quoted on page 314)
The Dunblane massacre was an example of the category of homicide known as “spree killing” or “amok killing”, which no gun control law can prevent. In the words of John Douglas, recently retired chief of criminal profiling for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, “You could deprive Hamilton of his guns. But someone like him is mission-oriented and where there is a will, there is a way, even with strict gun laws” (page 284).Mr Stevenson suggests that it is to the problem of development of mass murderers to which our attention should be directed, and not to the further restriction of lawfully-owned firearms.
Dunblane Primary School. ’16 children from this class were shot dead.’The official story is that, on 13 March (7)1996 (7), a mad loner called Thomas Hamilton shot dead 16(7) children at a primary school in Dunblane in Scotland.
Listen to Mick North: 743 rounds and 700 children, did we see our first modern crisis actors at Dunblane?
Don’t Blair and his ilk just love the 7’s: London 7/7/2005…777
All coincidence of course.
He just won Wimbledon 77 years after the last Brit ish male, on the anniversary on the 7/7 bombings by MI5/6 and Mossad, he broke Djokovic’s serve on the seventh game of each set…777
I was at a party recently for a good friend’s 50th, most if not all my old mates are 50 now or just over, me being the pup at a young and spritely 48, it was great seeing everyone together after so long, it reminds me how quickly time goes, and how much people change…or don’t, living in the land of Nod.
Amongst my buddies was a chap who I’ve known of, and he’s known of me for over 30 years, we’ve always Nodded, said ‘hi, how’s it goin’, the obligatory yet sincere greetings to people we kind of Know, know of. We’ve never had a beer together, any real conversations but I had some respect for him, I knew as a younger man he was respected, a bit of a handful if pushed, now.. a heart attack on hold.
Chatting after a few beers I was saying how I’m going for a career change, his response was: ” you’ve never stuck at anything in your life”…It didn’t sink in what he’d just said, I reminded him I’ve been a brickie since 1992…”But you’ve never worked on site”…I did think that a bit odd, where does he get his perceptions from? I told him I’d lost count of the sites I’d worked on…It was left at that from what I can remember and I went to the bar, slowly it started to niggle me but I left it alone, it was a mate’s party.
If he had any acumen at all, as he knows me so well, he would be taking into consideration the doctors at both the NHS and BUPA said my days in the trade were over, I’d be on epidurals and pain relief for years to come if not for ever; to throw out the tablets and stop spinal injections, to get back to fitness, to go self employed and get back on the trowel, bricklaying and plastering, is, I feel, classed as ‘sticking to something‘, maybe he was accounting for the last time I was homeless for almost 18 months, after losing a house thanks to a poison dwarf of en ex wife, and won my battles to get housed after all and sundry said I couldn’t get a flat; also I class as ‘sticking to something’
This chap doesn’t Know me, he thinks he does, as with all our lives there are those who know us and know what’s best for us; they gossip and criticise, pass judgement on our lives, all meant for the best of course, and always in our absence. I should be more like them; work all the hours I’m told to, weekends included, and allow myself a couple of weeks per year to ‘Holiday’, I know of one such ‘builder’ who takes a couple of days PER YEAR off as a holiday with his children ….he’ll swear money and ego are not his gods, while driving around in a two seat sports car with a private plate, wearing a peak cap and a duffle coat…. Mushroom’s: kept in the dark and fed faeces.
They live in the Land of Nod, they have NO D, No Sun; when we Nod our head, when we Nod off, we lose sight of the sun… D is the diameter and the radius, the sun on the Horizon, the Egyptian ‘T’, a DeNTaL,
These people don’t shine, they bring darkness.
When we Nod, do we not Bow? does one Bow to the crown? As a Bow is used in Archery, is not the Royal Arch degree the knowledge of the great year, the procession of the equinoxes; the Zodiac?… a simple Nod, with so much encoded, right in front of those who live in the land of Nod…mushrooms.
I No longer enjoy the building game and have thought it over the last 2 or 3 years, considering injuries carried and the general wear and tear, combined with my loss of interest that a change is afoot. I have had so many laughs and learnt so much in the trade, I’ve done bypasses and bridges, sewage works to sea defences, harbour repairs to deep excavations, I can build a house or a warehouse from footings to chimney pot so I have no regrets…on the contrary.
The whole point of being self employed, apart from recovering from a back injury and 5 years off work, was to keep off the sites; hard, heavy work, long hours and travelling daily, the hypocrisy and beaurocracy, the chase chase chase of the money, man I want this and that, I want, I want… you will need a Mort gage, and a nice shiny car, burn’t into the brain of the mushroom, the whole thing was not for me anymore, and taxed? A serf in Britain who works 12 months is taxed beyond most peoples comprehension; from January to July/August, every penny goes to the tax man, Every Penny; the serf is permitted the remaining months to live the dream they are indeed in.
So tell a man at a party, or any location of your choice, that tax is by consent and he’s being robbed, or, his big powerful shiny car isn’t his, Of course it is he’ll say….don’t tax it then and see how long it stays yours!….hit them with the Mort gage frauds and fiat currency; silence with a red face , first they laugh, then, if you persist and they don’t shut down, they get angry…. indeed his taxes are contributing, not just to the most heinous of war crimes seen on this planet, or any other planet I’m aware of, they are not only voting for it, they are paying for it with their hard earned fiat…sorry…cash… to de story our very own existence!
If they respond, as I’ve heard first hand in my local pub; “they can bomb who they like as long as it isn’t here” or when I asked a female, for she is neither a lady or a woman, if she was bothered with the half a million dead Iraqi children? she shook her head. Reminding them that the jew K pays the EU £33 million smackaroos PER DAY and all by their consent, or aquiescence would be more accurate, usually causes the brain to freeze, they start to silently and inwardly simmer, bring in that the EU is a direct result of Treason and the TV they’re glued to has lied to them since the 70’s about just that, well, Now your just into boring politics….the same politics that are by design, genociding the very heart of Britain, our people, laws and customs.
My point? I suppose after years of ‘sticking to‘ research that would send insane the likes of said man at said party, I’m used to the ridicule behind my back by those who live in the dark and know nothing of me, simply because of that, they know nothing of me, still they know what’s best for not just me; but humanity, and that’s fine, they’ve always roamed the Earth and always will, let them stab you in the back, at least you know you’re in front of them, deep down, so do they, the few that truly know me; know without hesitation or doubt, outnumbered a thousand to one I’d stand firm by their side, Mort gage…no thanks…Mort for my beliefs…in a heart beat; lose the fear…we’re a long time underground.
I’ve never liked mushrooms.
In politics, nothing happens by accident, if it happens you can bet it was planned that way: F.D.Roosevelt
11 Nov 2014
Channel 4 today announced at its Upfront 2015 event for the advertising industry that it has commissioned Hunted (wt), from Shine TV, producers of hit Channel 4 series The Island with Bear Grylls. The new series will dramatically explore the scale of Britain’s surveillance state’s all-seeing gaze.
Here in Britain, a new ‘reality’ tv show is being shown where; to keep it simple, it shows it to be a near impossibility to go ‘off grid’ as CH4 say. It is a series where members of the public, who see Britain for what it really is:
“ Ricky believes we are a tip-toe away from totalitarianism in the UK, claiming that George Orwell’s book 1984 was “supposed to be a warning – not an instruction manual”.
Surprised?…All medias are owned and run by jews, the world is waking to the jewish question and boy are they getting worried, 109 countries from memory have booted out these destroyers of cultures, and they want us to run?
I think not…that is something the Brits do not do…I’ll agree we have some history that is not to be boasted of, as is true of all nations historically, and yes we’ve been duped into wars…by who?…the chosen ones!
Our trusting nature is abused by those who represent these parasites, the crypto jews and sayanim in Parliament, His tory should show us politicians can never be trusted yet we hand them time and time again the benefit of the doubt, fooled by the folly that is politics, duped and deluded by the whores, war criminals and traitors of the mainstream medias.
The country love Bear Grylls, yet he is a proven liar and fraud, look at who his father’s, and his business partners are, he never flew over Eve’s rest in a flying machine, he never broke his back in a parachuting accident in Zambia or wherever he said; the Regiment weren’t their when he claimed it happened, he is the only other civilian, along with a photographer to share the green beret of the royal marines apart from?……Savile! Gryls is linked to the global angels of whom Ester Rantzen is also involved, the jewess who knew all about Savile’s antics along with most if not all the BBC.
Now his bosses want the waking Brits, those who are seeing behind what Cameron described in his speech as 911 being a jewish plot, and the London Bombings being staged….to be afraid of the surveillance state, to warn us if we go on the run, or go off grid that we cannot escape; run? you wish Murdoch, you and your chipping norton nonces will be shown by History for what you are.
Spot the difference: Staged Dave?
The best defence is an offence, make noise people, Britain and Europe is being invaded by 10’s of millions of ‘refugees’, Diversity and Multi-culturalism is good because the jews say it is, yet they keep Israel free from all except the chosen, murdering and genociding the real rightful owners of the land of Palestine.
Mainstream media are using the Psychological fear pawn to try and stop those who see…from doing…this is going to increase on the TV teaching you nationalism, patriotism, white pride etc are racist, nazi, white supremacist remarks, one of the many tactics of the 77th Brigade and GCHQ.
They also have their online activists we must be eternally vigilant for:
That said; there is some good stuff to learn from it all, I for one do not have a smart phone, I am as best I can be; off grid, I pay no tax, I put no money into my bank, I do not ‘drive’, and I make as much noise as i can with the resources I have, I talk to people, I even had police approach me a while back to say they get it….so there is a flip side to the Hunted….and Shine tv…but run? go f..k your chosen selves.
That the jews have always hated the English is no surprise to those who see, the need to Destory our culture, our customs, indeed our very way of life is Crystal.
The Noahide nutters and their crypto supporters and sayanim simpletons are drowned, submerged in cognitive dissonance, if not just plain insane and apathetic; which is more likely if history is to show us.
But throw a little light on the darkness of the talmudic terror facing the indigenous people of the British Isles, and it will dazzle the lies of the jews, hypnotized and indoctrinated by the Chabad Lubavitch lycanthrope lunatics.
That Rabid and Rabbi share similarities is by design?
There is little doubt that Jewish scribes ripped off the Flood story from the Gilgamesh tale and turned it into their own. How it was altered or edited provides insightful keys to the way in which “esoteric” and “metaphysical” or “spiritual” channels are established and for what purpose such channels may exist.
Since we know that the marking points are the Solstices and the Equinoxes, and these are marked further by major holidays of May Day/Beltaine and Holloween, we can see that the formula becomes self evident – IF WE USE NOTARICON!!!
AUTU(1314) = (15)TO1314 = (1+5=6) TO MN = 6 TO MN (1314)
The use of the Letter TU to represent the word TO is a NOTARICON component.
The AU shows that the letter placement is a 1 and 5 respective, and since we know that it is 6 weeks to the Letters MN, in that G represents the AU-TU-MN equinox, we can show that A+U = 1+5 = 6 weeks TO MN.